- Billie Holiday
- Leonard Cohen
- John Lennon
- Lou Reed
- Bob Dylan
- Neil Young
- Grace Jones
- Tom Waits
- Suzanne Vega
- Bjork
Yet, shows such as 'The Voice' and 'America's Got Talent' would have us believe that music 'talent' can be measured & divided into blocks and units, where vocal range, showmanship and self-confidence are the only, driving factors. As we become a more diverse society, one look at the top tier of the HOT 100, you'd think we were becoming less. This is not to say that there is no diversity of race, rather, diversity of sound.
In his PopMatters column 'All Things Reconsidered', Imran Khan has a brilliant piece on Suzanne Vega: 'Ordinary Magic: Suzanne Vega's 'Days of Open Hand'. I remember hearing stories at Barnard, also Vega's alma mater, about how she would play her guitar & sing so quietly, everyone had to gather closely around her to hear. The intimacy was real & palpable for her listeners.
In his Scientific American article 'Is Pop Music Evolving, or Is It Just Getting Louder?' John Matson discusses the devolution of both timbre & pitch, and how this results in an overall homogenization of the music at the top tier. As cultures & ethnicities merge, mix and mingle, our world is becoming more colorful, more complex, more interesting. So, why is it that what most people hear on the radio & on streaming services is the same songs, over & over, ad infinitum?
Hypebot has a great discussion: "Why Radio Plays Same 20 Songs: The Sad Truth Of Media Consolidation [INFOGRAPHIC]". The crux of it is:
"only six companies control 90% of the media."And further:
"Consolidation of media has lead to far less diversity in programming and ownership, with far fewer voices being heard. Media consolidation has heavily affected the balance and diversity of today's music on terrestrial radio. This is great news if you’re Drake, Lil Wayne, Lady Gaga and the like, but not so great if you’re just about anybody else."The Wall Street Journal's recent article by Hannah Karp "Radio's Answer to Spotify? Less Variety Stations Create More Repetition, Fearing Listeners Will Tune Out Unfamiliar Tunes" sums it up:
"Faced with growing competition from digital alternatives, traditional broadcasters have managed to expand their listenership with an unlikely tactic: offering less variety than ever. The strategy is based on a growing amount of research that shows in increasingly granular detail what radio programmers have long believed—listeners tend to stay tuned when they hear a familiar song, and tune out when they hear music they don't recognize."Great radio still exists, but listeners must do some digging: the combination of information overload & attention deficit makes this impossible for most. The 'TOP TIER RULE' still governs most people's habits: whether in advertising or finance, what we see (or in this case, hear) is what most people get.
At a time when independent artists are still making the most progressive, vital & important music, the equation hasn't changed, where their efforts & ideas serve as grist for the major label grill. Most people don't realize that many of the ideas they hear at the 'top tier' are actually re-packaged, re-processed ideas that bubbled-up from the underground. It's not that the majors do it better, they do it bigger.
While there's KEXP in Seattle & WDET in Detroit (The Progressive Underground With Chris Campbell), most listeners tune in to what is easiest, most accessible, and in the final analysis, most advertised. It's 'might makes right' on the FM dial.
GREAT MUSIC used to be the Holy Grail of the A&R Executive, but, sadly, that is no longer the case. It's an only the strongest survive, winner takes all mentality which guarantees air play & ratings.....
Or does it?
1 comment:
Great blog post. I fully agree. I read an article last week on my Facebook news feed about how lyrics in music have been greatly dumbed down and the highest artists that was analyzed reached a third-grade reading level. Your lyrics are definitely not. I don't think many know the definition of "polyglot" or "octoroon."
I also agree with the arts in education. A vital resource is lost. Politicians and the corporations who benefit from Common Core (Pearson being the main one) do not educate themselves how music and art develops ALL minds. My accountant is a huge fan of Anne Sexton, and my dentist told me his favorite classes were literature classes.
My four-year-old daughter Ciara (pr. KIR-ah; my husband and I chose the Gaeli spelling because he is 99% Irish-American and proud) loves art and music. We live in an 860-foot condo we bought right before the 2008 crash, but we have taken a portion of the living room so Ciara can use it as her "art studio." I know every mother says her child is so talented, but Ciara's art work and her spatial sence is very developed for four years of age. I showed her paintings to her doctor the other day and he was taken aback.
"Did she really draw the bird?" he asked.
Ciara sings to herself constantly. On our local park swings last weekend, she was singing as my husband pushed her. Today she was singing to herself. My husband and I signed her up for age-appropriate voice lessons at the Sherwood School of Music through Columbia College here in Chicago. This is where it seems her bliss is headed. Even as baby, she hummed to herself when she was falling asleep.
Our budge will be strained, but we did not want to enroll her into the Chicago Public Schools. Our Catholic parish has an elementary school. When I went on a tour, I was struck by how the school is so focused on art. After school until parents can pick them up, they have music, dance, and reading options outside the curriculum.
I danced in high school, and played the flute from the age of 10-15. I know both benefit.
Regarding the business of music, are you on Tidal? Apple Streaming? Taylor Swift forced Apple to pay artists during the free-month trial.
Post a Comment